| |
|
|
Researchers have long been interested in the occupational
position of individuals, both because occupations are the
result of a prior events such as the level of education
or the type of vocational training, and because occupations
are closely associated with earnings, and thus with the
level of consumption and type of life style afforded. As
well, a person's occupation may capture certain risks, such
as occupational accidents and it may indicate the standard
of living available to other family members, thus serving
as a measure of the socioeconomic origins of later generations.
Since the 1950s, sociologists have sought to transform census
occupational classifications into interval scales in order
to take advantage of multivariate methods of analysis. I
was familiar with these scales in some of my early work
on social inequality, and in the 1980s I became interested
in the possibility that gender specific scales existed.
Later I worked with Charles Nam, Florida State University
to produce socioeconomic scores for occupations in the United
States, using a methodology he developed. More recently
I have taken the Canadian 2001 Census classification of
occupations and have transformed them into socioeconomic
scores, suitable for multivariate analysis both as independent
and dependent variables.
Select Bibliography on Miscellaneous Topics
| 2008 |
(forthcoming) A Socioeconomic
Scale for Canada: Measuring Occupational Status from
the Census. Canadian Review of Sociology (formerly CRSA)
45(1). |
| 2004 |
Occupational
Status in 2000: Over a Century of Census-Based Measurement.
(Charles Nam and Monica Boyd) Population Research and
Policy Review 23(4). |
| 2004 |
Recasting/Rethinking
SES Scales: An Allegorical Tale of How Dinosaurs can
Become Birds. Presentation at a Thematic Session
on Inequality, annual meeting of the Canadian Sociology
and Anthropology Association, May 29 - June 1, Toronto. |
| 1990 |
Sex Differences in Occupational
Skill: Canada, 1961-1986. Canadian Review of Sociology
and Anthropology 27 (August): 285-315. |
| 1986 |
Socioeconomic Indices
and Sexual Inequality: A Tale of Scales. Canadian
Review of Sociology and Anthropology 23 (November):
457-480. |
| 1982 |
Women, Men and Socioeconomic
Indices (Monica Boyd and Hugh A. McRoberts). In Mary
Powers (ed.), Socioeconomic Status: Concepts and
Measurement Issues. Washington, D.C.: The American
Association for the Advancement of Science. |
|