THE FIRST COMERS
Establishing the Paleoindians
- Folsom site, eastern New Mexico, 1926, J.D.
Figgins
- 19 Folsom points, in association with Bison
antiquus; now dated 10,500 BP
- Blackwater Draw, eastern New Mexico, 1937
- J.L. Cotter found 2 Clovis points in association
with mammoth bones; now dated 11,200 BP
- this site also yielded Folsom and other Late
Paleoindian artifacts
- Folsom and Clovis now known from many
APaleoindian@ sites throughout western and
central North America
- in the last 65 years, no culture older than Clovis has been confirmed in North America
- but there have been some sites: was Clovis
first?
Routes
- 2 questions here: (1) who were the AFirst
North Americans@? (2) how did they get south
of the ice?
Routes I: Who were they?
- probably descendants of Upper Paleolithic
hunters in N.E. Asia: Dyuktai Culture
- Dyuktai: widespread throughout eastern
Siberia beginning 18,000 BP
- bifacial tools, microblades, and choppers
- probably Sinodonts (ie., AChinese-like teeth@, C. Turner): shovel-shaped incisors, single-rooted upper first pre-molar, triple-rooted lower first molars
- Sinodonts found in northern Asia and America
- probably developed in China before 20,000
BP, moved into N.E. Asia ca. 20,000 BP
(Dyuktai?), and into North America ca. 14,000
BP
- Sinodont hypothesis receives support from
genetic and linguistic evidence
- genetic evidence compared Gm allotypes
(blood protein) in New World indigenous
groups
- result: one very large group with similar Gm allotypes, and two smaller groups with different Gm allotypes
- interpretation: 3 distinguishable migrations
into New World
- linguistic evidence (J. Greenberg) compared
N. and S. American languages
- result: one Asuper-language@ family,
Amerinds; and two smaller families, Na-Dene,
and Eskimo-Aleut
- genetic and linguistic evidence in close
agreement: 3 groups that diverged (from
common N.E. Asian ancestor: Sinodont?) more
than 10,000 years ago
- this evidence points to Beringia as likely point
of entry into New World
- alo implies multiple migrations through
Beringia, beginning late Pleistocene
- alternatives to Beringia migration: (1) South
Pacific; pre-Lapita voyagers? (2) North
Atlantic; Upper Paleolithic ice-walkers?
- neither hypothesis is likely
- a vast, low-lying land mass connecting Siberia
to Alaska during last glaciation (Wurm-Wisconsin)
- fully formed 75,000-45,000 BP (cold period,
lowered sea levels)
- almost submerged 40,000-25,000 BP
(warming trend)
- wider again 20,000-14,000 BP (cold period)
- after 14,000 BP, Beringia shrinking rapidly
due to warming; disappears by 12,000 BP?
- a steppe-tundra environment, very cold and
dry, not glaciated
- Beringian vegetation: varied with climate;
sedges and grasses, few trees
- Beringian fauna: variety of mammals
including mammoth, bison caribou, horses,
musk ox, and many smaller mammals C
abundance varied with climate, probably not
very high during cold periods
- probably Sinodonts who gave rise to
Amerinds: Nenana Complex
- Nenana: central Alaskan stone tool complex;
dated +12,000 BP
- projectile points (Chindadn), no microblades;
technology similar to Ushki I (Kamchatka),
dated 14,300-13,600 BP, and to Clovis
- probably terrestrial hunters in Beringian steppe
- key sites: Broken Mammoth, Walker Road,
Dry Creek
- Denali Complex differs from Nenana in
presence of microblades/cores
- very similar technologically to Dyuktai
- found in Dry Creek site, stratigraphically
above Nenana material
- dated to 10,500 BP
- 2 possible routes out of Beringia: (1) inland
Aice-free corridor@, (2) coastal route
- eastern foothills of Rocky Mts. (Alberta),
between Laurentide and Cordilleran ice sheets
- most likely route of terrestrial hunters
(Nenana/Clovis?)
- but corridor inhospitable until ca. 13,000 BP
(glacial flooding, ice dams, high winds)
- 2 sites once suggested ice-free corridor
migration before 13,000 BP: (1) Taber child, (2)
Wilson Butte Cave, Oregon
- Taber now re-dated ca. 3,500 BP
- Wilkson Butte dated 14,500 BP, but "artifact"
assemblage is small and dubious
- implies martime-adpated Beringian cultures
(which is likely)
- also implies ice-free Pacific coast by +12,000
BP (not likely)
- some argue that ice-free refugia existed in late
Pleistocene (eg., Queen Charlotte Is.; bears at
14,000 BP)
- but oldest Q.C.I. site is Ellen Island, 9,500 BP
- big problem with verifying coastal route: sites
older than 10,000 BP probably submerged
- are there any sites in the New World older
than 11,500 BP?
- two localities in northern Yukon: Old Crow
Flats and Bluefish Caves
Old Crow Flats
- investigated by W. Irving, U of T, 1970s
- lots of mammoth and other Pleistocene bone
- "caribou bone flesher" C14 dated 27,000 BP; re-dated (AMS) 2,000 BP
- no other clear association of artifacts with Pleistocene bone
- mammoth bone "tools" now regarded as
naturally fractured (M. Friesen)
Bluefush Caves
- 3 small rock shelters south of Old Crow, excavated by J. Cinq-Mars 1978-85
- small tool assemblage includes burins, microblades, mammoth bone "core", in Llte Pleistocene loess deposit
- C14 dated 12,900-15,500 BP
- but tool assemblage is very small and
association with mammoth bone layer is unclear
- Q: Old Crow and Bluefish Caves both located
in Beringia -- why shouldn't there be pre-Clovis
sites here?
- many possibilities, but best 3 are:
Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Pedra Furada,
Monte Verde
Meadowcroft Rockshelter
- located in Pennsylvania; archaeologist, J. Adovasio 1970s
- stratigraphic sequence of dates to +19,000 BP (Stratum IIa); good artifact association
- criticisms: (1) dates contaminated by ancient carbon in ground water (esp. in Stratum IIa);
(2) fauna and flora from IIa are Holocene, not Pleistocene
- Adovasio counters; debate goes on
Pedra Furada
- large rockshelter located in N.E. Brazil, several excavators, 1980s
- dated to 40,000 BP
- but Pleistocene "artifacts" are very crude, and may be "geofacts"
- and so-called hearths may be from natural
fires, so charcoal dates may not be cultural
Monte Verde
- open site in N. Chile, T. Dillehay, 1980s
- 2 sets of dates -- earliest around 30,000 BP; later set around +12,000 BP
- older dates now rejected -- no good artifact association
- but 12,000 BP dates have been accepted by
many skeptics; reliable dates, good artifact
association
Q: what are the implications for pre-Clovis of
Beringian descendents in South America by
12,000 BP?
- several recently excavated sites from coastal
California suggest an early maritime adaptation
- Daisy Cave, San Miguel Island -- maritime
location, shellfish, 9500 BP
- Cross Creek, central Calif. coast --
millingstones, 9500 BP
- Baja human skulls, dated ca. 8,000 BP, very
different craniometrics from Paleoindian
- above evidence may support coastal migration route