Solutions
to Sample Questions 3
1. Please state the Second Welfare Theorem,
making clear what conditions
are
required for it to hold.
The
Second Welfare Theorem states that every Pareto efficient allocation can be
sustained as a competitive equilibrium, given appropriate lump sum
redistribution and sufficient convexity.
[Please make sure you know the formal definition of a competitive
equilibrium.]
1a. How does the Second Welfare Theorem relate
to the First Welfare
Theorem?
The
First Welfare Theorem states that every competitive equilibrium is
Pareto-efficient. Under the right
conditions, the Second Welfare Theorem shows that the reverse is also true.
2. Explain clearly how the Second Welfare
Theorem is relevant to the issue
of
decentralization.
The
Second Welfare Theorem gives conditions under which a given Pareto-efficient
allocation can be decentralized that is, provided using the price mechanism
by the private market, featuring optimizing individuals who take prices as
given.
3. Explain clearly why lump-sum transfers may
be needed to decentralize a
given
allocation in the economy. Here, you
should refer to a two-person
Edgeworth
Box diagram, and explain precisely how a given allocation can be decentralized,
under the right conditions.
[We saw
the relevant diagram in class.] Start
at a point on the contract curve the point we wish to decentralize. If indifference curves are convex, then we
can draw a line through the point that is tangent to these indifference curves,
whose slope depends on the price ratio of the two goods. As long as the initial endowments of the two
agents do not lie on this line but are instead given by another point in the
box, then the government must adjust endowments to move individuals onto this
line.
4. Why might being able to decentralize an
allocation be important? Here,
you
should think about the relative merits of central planning versus
decentralization.
If an
allocation can be decentralized, this shows that the market mechanism could be used
to provide that allocation of resources.
A number of economists have argued that the market mechanism will
generally be superior to the (extreme) alternative of central planning, as
markets are able to make better use of local information, in particular,
information about individual preferences.
5a. Suppose a firm takes prices as given, and
the price it faces for its
product
is $6. Let the firm's total cost
function be given by C(Q) = Q^2, where Q is output (and ^2 denotes 'raising to
the power 2').
i. Write down the firm's profit function.
Profit
= TR TC = 6Q Q^2
ii. Solve for the firm's profit maximizing
output level. What is it?
Q*
solves d(profit)/dQ = 0 or 6 2Q = 0.
This implies Q* = 3.
iii. At this output level, what is the firm's
average revenue, marginal
revenue,
and marginal cost?
AR = P
= 6, MR = 6, MC = dC/dQ = 2Q, and if Q = 3, then MC = 6 also.
5b. Now suppose that the firm has market
power. By selling more output,
the
firm is forced to lower its price. Let
the firm's demand curve be given by
P =
6 - Q.
The
firm still faces the same cost function as in 5a.
i. Write down a general expression for the
firm's total revenue.
TR = PQ
= (6 Q)Q
ii. Write down a general expression for the
firm's profit.
Profit
= TR TC = (6 Q)Q Q^2 = 6Q 2Q^2
iii. Solve for the firm's profit maximizing
output level. What is it?
Q*
solves d(profit)/dQ = 0, implying that 6 4Q = 0, so Q* = 3/2.
iv. At this output level, what is the firm's
marginal cost and the firm's
average
revenue?
AR = P
= 6 3/2 = 9/2.
MC = 2Q
= 3 [and note that MR = 6 2Q = 3 also]
Clearly,
MC < AR.
v. Is this level of output efficient (in the
sense that the extra cost to
society
equals the extra benefit)? If not,
please calculate the efficient
level
of output, explaining your reasoning carefully.
The
efficient output level occurs where MC = AR, or 6 Q = 2Q, implying Q* =
2. Thus the monopolist is
under-producing.
vi. Intuitively, what is the problem with
monopoly from society's
point-of-view?
[two sentences]
Monopoly
leads to less production than is socially optimal. At the monopoly output level, the marginal benefit to society
exceeds the marginal cost of an additional unit of output, so by increasing
output, the total net benefit to society would increase.
vii. Why does monopoly create a potential role
for government? [two
sentences]
Monopoly
is an instance of market failure that creates a potential role for government,
either to regulate the monopoly directly, or to increase competition by
promoting entry to the industry.
Government intervention usually has costs associated with it, to it is
important to consider whether government intervention will in fact improve
matters.